From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-27 17:56:19 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!ccsdec1.ufsia.ac.be!reks.uia.ac.be!idefix.CS.kuleuven.ac.be!
 Belgium.EU.net!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!fnnews.fnal.gov!gw2.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail
From: ka@socrates.hr.att.com (Kenneth Almquist)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Message-ID: <D645uH.Dqr@nntpa.cb.att.com>
Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: socrates.hr.att.com
Organization: AT&T
References: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk>
 <gauthier-2403951115540001@164.81.60.62>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 19:23:05 GMT
Date: 1995-03-27T19:23:05+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen, LJK Software) writes:
> For an address representation clause, which might be used to access hardware,
> optimizing out dead assignments seems quite inappropriate.  Is there no
> Ada83 method of avoiding such an optimization for such objects?

Pragma Atomic will suppress these optimizations.
					Kenneth Almquist