From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-26 22:49:36 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!uhog.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news.bu.edu!gw2.att.com!nntpa!not-for-mail
From: ka@socrates.hr.att.com (Kenneth Almquist)
Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ?
Message-ID: <D6343I.5Kn@nntpa.cb.att.com>
Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: socrates.hr.att.com
Organization: AT&T
References: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk>
 <gauthier-2403951115540001@164.81.60.62> <D5z3sF.1ou@nntpa.cb.att.com>
 <3l12v1$9ga@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 05:47:41 GMT
Date: 1995-03-27T05:47:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) writes:
> Look at the GNAT file i-cpoerr.ads (Interfaces.C.Posix_Error).  It's
> in there.
>
> (I think it _solves_ the problem, but doesn't answer your concerns)

It doesn't use exceptions.  You are right, of course--any problem with
exceptions can be _solved_ by simply not using exceptions.  Why didn't
I think of that?  :-)
				Kenneth Almquist