From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aa14b6b4a296ae8b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-19 15:00:27 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uknet!cix.compulink.co.uk!usenet
From: usagi@cix.compulink.co.uk ("Jim Wall")
Subject: Re: Objects the Booch/Rational way - help !
Message-ID: <D5pJzt.MDo@cix.compulink.co.uk>
Organization: Jimbo                         
References: <3id5g3$bsd@swlab1.msd.ray.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:04:41 GMT
X-News-Software: Ameol
Date: 1995-03-19T22:04:41+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

As an alternative perspective on this (and I confess to my inexperience 
in OO - what I've been taught is OMT - be tolerant please:-) perhaps it's 
the original types that are wrong.

Do we really care who the banker's mechanic is, or do we care about who 
Mr Blogg's (who happens to be a banker) mechanic is?

Ie. Are the attributes of Mr Bloggs that make him a banker of any 
relevance whatsoever when it comes to worrying about his who his Mechanic 
is??