From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,c890e6ab3fb2c5fc X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c890e6ab3fb2c5fc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-06 07:29:34 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Path: swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!noc.near.net!ray.com!news.ray.com!news.ed.ray.com!swlnews.msd.ray.com!swlvx2!jgv From: jgv@swl.msd.ray.com (John Volan) Subject: Re: Subject/Object Confusion Syndrome [was: Ada Objects Help] Sender: news@swlvx2.msd.ray.com (NEWS USER) Organization: Raytheon Company, Tewksbury, MA Message-ID: References: <3f9g1u$j4m@nps.navy.mil> <3fu6qc$pc5@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <3g3uc0$hm6@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <3g49bu$7fv@nps.navy.mil> <3go64b$m4u@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <3gu21g$ch@portal.gmu.edu> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 1995 14:01:02 GMT Xref: swrinde comp.lang.ada:26264 comp.lang.c++:112244 Date: 1995-02-06T14:01:02+00:00 List-Id: bsanden@isse.gmu.edu (Bo I. Sanden) writes: >For anyone interested in the subject-object relationship especially >w.r.t. Ada tasking, I respectfully submit that I took exactly that >tack (including the term "subject") in my book, "Software Systems >Construction with Examples in Ada" (Prentice-Hall 1994). Interesting ... I honestly haven't run across your book (yet), else I certainly would have credited you with coining the term for this, er, subject. :-) >Bo Sanden >George Mason University >Fairfax, Virginia -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Me : Person := (Name => "John G. Volan", E_Mail_Address => "jgv@swl.msd.ray.com", Employer => "Raytheon", Affiliation => "Enthusiastic member of Team-Ada!", Favorite_Slogan => "Ada95: The World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL", Humorous_Language_Lawyerly_Disclaimer => "These opinions are undefined by my employer, so using them would be " & "totally erroneous ... or would that be a bounded error? :-) "); --------------------------------------------------------------------------------