From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b379ffdd6f9e2e4e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-14 11:25:38 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!rutgers!sgigate.sgi.com!enews.sgi.com!lll-winken.llnl.gov!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!gatech!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!paperboy.wellfleet.com!noc.near.net!inmet!henning!stt
From: stt@henning.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Ada 9X Rationale -- Last Call
Message-ID: <D0tFAr.3ot@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com
Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 1994 19:25:38 GMT
Date: 1994-12-14T19:25:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

If you or anyone you know has pending comments on the
Ada 9X Rationale document, please e-mail them to me
ASAP.  John Barnes is trying to finalize the document within
the next few days, and would appreciate any comments you
have if they can be sent in by tomorrow morning (12/15/1994).
Sorry for the short notice.  There is no need to repeat
comments sent in earlier by other channels, unless you think
they might have gotten lost.

Thanks in advance.
-Tucker Taft   stt@inmet.com
Ada 9X Mapping/Revision Team