From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,474d28ddf953b3c1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-13 14:48:29 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!noc.near.net!inmet!dsd!stt
From: stt@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: Ada 95 is the name
Message-ID: <D0rr90.3IL@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com
Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
References: <3bi9sq$17r@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
 <1994Dec9.173347.18649@sei.cmu.edu> <ichbiah.81.2EEB4C2F@jdi.tiac.net>
 <3cho0b$k4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 1994 21:48:36 GMT
Date: 1994-12-13T21:48:36+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3cho0b$k4f@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com>,
Garlington KE <l107353@cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com> wrote:

>Jean D. Ichbiah (ichbiah@jdi.tiac.net) wrote:
>
>:  There is no such thing as "Ada83/7":  I wrote the manual and you can
>:  read it :  The language published in 1983 is called "Ada".  And now, 
>: as you  read, the new language is called "Ada 95".
>
>I've been curious about this, too. My copy of the draft Ada 95 manual just says
>"Programming Language Ada" on the title page. The Foreword (at least in
>draft 5.0) says, "ISO/IEC 8652 defines the Ada programming language, a
>general-purpose language designed to support the construction of long-lived,
>highly reliable software systems. This International Standard replaces the
>previous version of 1987."
>
>If this is so, shouldn't Ada mean The Latest Ada (at least as of 1995), and
>Ada 95 and Ada 87 be the preferred form when referring to the current version
>and the previous version in the same context?

Yes, "Ada" by itself will eventually come to mean the latest Ada.
But most available "Ada" compilers today handle Ada 83/87, so
it might be confusing to start to presume "Ada" meant Ada 95.
Better to be explicit until we are all using the latest version.

Note that sometimes a new language standard does not replace the old one.
However, in the case of Ada, the new ISO standard replaces the old
one, and similarly for ANSI.  I believe that at least for a while
(perhaps still), "Fortran" meant Fortran 77 and "Fortran 90" was
considered a distinct standard (perhaps only by ANSI?).

>Ken Garlington                  GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com
>F-22 Computer Resources         Lockheed Fort Worth Co.

-Tucker Taft   stt@inmet.com
Intermetrics, Inc.