From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8ecedf1d06879cf6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-12-01 13:21:59 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news2.near.net!noc.near.net!inmet!dsd!bobduff
From: bobduff@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Bob Duff)
Subject: Re: Access discriminants in tasks (9X)
Message-ID: <D05EFz.6r5@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
Keywords: Ada9X
Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com
Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
References: <3b2emu$19f@wynkyn.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 20:04:46 GMT
Date: 1994-12-01T20:04:46+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3b2emu$19f@wynkyn.ecs.soton.ac.uk>,
Ken Thomas <kst@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>Can tasks being limited types have access discriminants.

Yes.

- Bob
-- 
Bob Duff                                bobduff@inmet.com
Oak Tree Software, Inc.
Ada 9X Mapping/Revision Team (Intermetrics, Inc.)