From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f891f,e1ba068f3d0b43e2
X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,e1ba068f3d0b43e2
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e1ba068f3d0b43e2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,e1ba068f3d0b43e2
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-19 12:20:37 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.misc,comp.software-eng
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!urmel.informatik.rwth-aachen.de!newsserver.rrzn.uni-hannover.de!aix11.hrz.uni-oldenburg.de!nordwest.germany.eu.net!pophh!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!news-feed-1.peachnet.edu!paperboy.wellfleet.com!noc.near.net!ray.com!news.ray.com!news.ed.ray.com!swlvx2!swlrb9.msd.ray.com!jjm
From: jjm@swlrb9.msd.ray.com (James Murphy {75881})
Subject: Re: Safety-Critical Survey (Results)
X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-22
Reply-To: jjm@swlrb9.msd.ray.com (James Murphy {75881})
Sender: news@swlvx2.msd.ray.com (NEWS USER)
Organization: Raytheon Company
Message-ID: <CzFJB6.J3E@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>
References: <cppCz89Cz.sH@netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 1994 20:52:17 GMT
Xref: nntp.gmd.de comp.lang.ada:16815 comp.lang.c++:79536 comp.lang.misc:9716
 comp.software-eng:20143
Date: 1994-11-17T20:52:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <cppCz89Cz.sH@netcom.com>, cpp@netcom.com (Robin Rowe) writes:

|>Every response to the survey was positive except one. An individual 
|>at Rockwell Collins said: "The language(s) we do/don't use is a 
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|>matter best left to us, our customers, and the appropriate 
|>regulatory agencies governing our businesses and markets. All of 
|>these parties also look out for the public's interests in safety, 
|>cost, etc. as well." This individual took me to task for not 
|>contacting the PR department of his company, but was unwilling to 
|>help me do so. Per his request, I have omitted his company.
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Unless my computer is making stuff up, it appears that you didn't.

Not a good idea if you wish others to place their confidentiality into
your trust in the future.

-- 
The opinion expressed here are mine, not my employers.  In fact,
opinions are probably the one thing developed at work that
employers do _not_ claim ownership of.