From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,faa31ce746726af0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-02 12:11:27 PST
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Path: 
 bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!hookup!news.moneng.mei.com!uwm.edu!lll-winken.llnl.gov!uop!pacbell.com!att-out!nntpa!not-for-mail
From: ka@socrates.hr.att.com (Kenneth Almquist)
Subject: Re: Ada vs Modula3
Message-ID: <CynpF4.6Mn@nntpa.cb.att.com>
Sender: news@nntpa.cb.att.com (Netnews Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: socrates.hr.att.com
Organization: AT&T
References: <37dir6$d93@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 1994 20:11:27 GMT
Date: 1994-11-02T20:11:27+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Phil Brooke <pjb25@cam.ac.uk> asked:
> Has anyone got any comments on the relative merits of Modula3 and Ada (9X)?

One major difference is that Moldula 3 has automatic garbage collection.
Ada implementations are not required to provide this, and most don't.
					Kenneth Almquist