From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a8985ede8fe3d111 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-23 12:14:45 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!noc.near.net!inmet!dsd!bobduff From: bobduff@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Bob Duff) Subject: Re: Child packages Message-ID: Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com Organization: Intermetrics, Inc. References: <1994Oct4.090807@di.epfl.ch> <38496c$1l1@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> <385thq$kh6@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 16:40:49 GMT Date: 1994-10-20T16:40:49+00:00 List-Id: In article , I wrote: >This is an interesting point. Note, however, that the contents of a >package body, and the contents of a *private* child package, are hidden >from clients and from new (public) children. That's not quite right, of course. Private children are not hidden from the *bodies* of their public siblings. -- Bob Duff bobduff@inmet.com Oak Tree Software, Inc. Ada 9X Mapping/Revision Team (Intermetrics, Inc.)