From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,405c9fed403b342b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-30 15:06:11 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!attbi_s51.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeff C," Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1b585154.0312211634.6c414d2e@posting.google.com> <1b585154.0312300730.459483cc@posting.google.com> <1b585154.0312301431.6816874d@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: Program Terminates ... X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.34.215.119 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s51 1072825570 24.34.215.119 (Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:06:10 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:06:10 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 23:06:10 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3971 Date: 2003-12-30T23:06:10+00:00 List-Id: "Peter Richtmyer" wrote in message news:1b585154.0312301431.6816874d@posting.google.com... > "Jeff C," wrote in message news:... > > > I do notice all the cygwin errors > > you are getting saying that > > the data might not be meaningful > > > > Do you get the same results if you are not using the cygwin environment > > since GNAT is not officially > > supported on Cygwin (it is a currently a mingw based win32 distribution). > > I am not using Cygwin - could not even find that DLL on my computer. > I think gnatmem is confused there. Also, the gnatmem output did show alot > of DEALLOC messages for unbounded_string's (along with the ALLOC's). > Hmm..Interesting. I have not seen a cygwin error message come of out. What version of GNAT are you running? > > > Hey. Could it be that the Unbounded_String's are not the problem per se, > but the fact that they are within record objects being dynamically > allocated is the problem? Or one of the problems? > Well, if these record are either not controlled types or are never explicitly free'd then yes this could be the problem.