From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f805ceba146bd74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-10-13 13:56:21 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swrinde!sgiblab!sgigate.sgi.com!odin!shindo.esd.sgi.com!davemc From: davemc@shindo.esd.sgi.com (Dave McAllister) Subject: Re: Ada NEWS -- Week Ending 7 Oct 1994 Message-ID: Sender: news@odin.corp.sgi.com (Net News) Nntp-Posting-Host: shindo.esd.sgi.com Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. References: <1994Oct7.181343.9070@sei.cmu.edu> <37haa0$baf@scoop.eco.twg.com> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 1994 15:23:30 GMT Date: 1994-10-13T15:23:30+00:00 List-Id: I personally like the 9X designation. In fact, I went 'on record' in 1992 at the Ada/Australia conference that 9X should be left as the designation. If he products are solid and timely, why dump all the coverage hte 9X name has today? Dave McAllister -- Product Manager, Compilers Silicon Graphics, Inc *SHINDO - the ART of the MIND*