From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,256d88732296b589 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-29 18:48:35 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!lazrus.cca.rockwell.com!fms0.cca.rockwell.com!wemagor From: wemagor@fms0.cca.rockwell.com (Wayne Magor) Subject: Re: generic call backs Message-ID: Sender: news@lazrus.cca.rockwell.com Nntp-Posting-Host: fms31.cca.rockwell.com Reply-To: wemagor@fms0.cca.rockwell.com (Wayne Magor) Organization: Rockwell International X-Newsreader: mxrn 6.18-4 References: <1994Sep28.121301.24095@penny.cs.fredonia.edu> <36cn7u$a3k@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 1994 21:03:01 GMT Date: 1994-09-29T21:03:01+00:00 List-Id: In article <36cn7u$a3k@gnat.cs.nyu.edu>, dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > >Are you really saying that Dec Ada allows two package specs to with one >another? surely not, this is a clearly illegal program, which any Ada >compiler should be expected to detect and disallow. I hate to say this Robert, but this is a dumb question. You of all people should know better than to even ask this. Wayne.