From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,66253344eaef63db X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,66253344eaef63db X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,66253344eaef63db X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-30 08:18:36 PST Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.object,comp.lang.c++ Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!swiss.ans.net!solaris.cc.vt.edu!uunet!allegra!alice!bs From: bs@alice.att.com (Bjarne Stroustrup <9758-26353> 0112760) Subject: Re: Mut. Recurs. in Ada9X w/o Breaking Encaps.? (LONG) Message-ID: Keywords: Ada 9X, C++, object-oriented Organization: Info. Sci. Div., AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ References: <1994Sep27.184827.17813@wdl.loral.com> <1994Sep29.014611.20263@swlvx2.msd.ray.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 1994 17:20:43 GMT Xref: bga.com comp.lang.ada:6331 comp.object:6913 comp.lang.c++:31082 Date: 1994-09-29T17:20:43+00:00 List-Id: stt@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes > This capability of Ada 9X is vaguely related to the "assignment attempt" > of Eiffel, and the dynamic_cast of ANSI/ISO C++-to-be, Ah. Hmm. I have noted a tendency to treat newer C++ features as if they were some sort of science fiction. Features such as dynamic_cast are currently available in widely-used commercial implementations of C++ as well as being part of the emerging standard. I think it would be best to leave out phrases such as ``ANSI/ISO C++-to-be'' as possibly prejudicial. Alternatively, one could start a flamewar by trying to be fair by applying matching adjectives to Ada9X and Eiffel. - Bjarne