From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9c193e01cab96e4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone01.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe28.ams2.POSTED!40385e62!not-for-mail
From: Per Sandberg <per.sandberg@bredband.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C vs. ada for embeded system
References: <gotp01$kbm$1@news.metronet.hr>
In-Reply-To: <gotp01$kbm$1@news.metronet.hr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <CTAsl.51131$2t6.14097@newsfe28.ams2>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@WWWSpace.NET
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:34:42 UTC
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:54:18 +0100
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4974
Date: 2009-03-07T20:54:18+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Well  would say that that depends entirely where you think its worth 
spend your time. 100 Hours upfront designing and fighting the compiler 
or 500 hours after delivery fighting with the debugger.
And in my experience that counts for all kinds of systems.

abcd wrote:
> why ada is better of  "C" language  for embeded system? 
> 
>