From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,89cb2d7ffc7421c9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s72.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" Organization: jrcarter at acm dot org User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ripple effect References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.176 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s72 1156462754 12.201.97.176 (Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:39:14 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:39:14 GMT Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:39:14 GMT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6362 Date: 2006-08-24T23:39:14+00:00 List-Id: Maciej Sobczak wrote: > > Why? > If you remove some use clause that might affect the visibility of some > primitive operation, then it will also remove the whole type that is > involved in a given expression, rendering the whole as illegal. > > Could you provide a short example of this Ripple effect? No. I'm simply aware that STT cites direct operator visibility as potentially giving rise to the Ripple effect in the Ada FAQ http://www.adapower.com/index.php?Command=Class&ClassID=FAQ&CID=358 -- Jeff Carter "Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 07