From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d71adacc01ff5d45 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-18 03:48:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SDL bindings Date: 18 Nov 2001 05:48:03 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1006084087 32366 192.135.80.34 (18 Nov 2001 11:48:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 11:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16669 Date: 2001-11-18T05:48:03-06:00 List-Id: In article , Rajat Datta writes: > All links to an SDL binding for Ada seems to point to > http://www.adapower.net/~avargas, which is no longer reachable. Is there any > other way to get the binding? What is the "SDL" discussed in this context ? The Structure Definition Language I use is obviously not it from the context of discussions.