From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,eec376a334ad59ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-12 10:23:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!207.115.63.138!newscon04.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr14.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: hashing(HATs. A more efficient algorithm?) References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.112.200.91 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr14.news.prodigy.com 1018632162 ST000 67.112.200.91 (Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:22:42 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:22:42 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: SCSGGTSDZRRQBQH]]RKB_UDAZZ\DPCPDLXUNNHLHEQR@ETUCCNSKQFCY@TXDX_WHSVB]ZEJLSNY\^J[CUVSA_QLFC^RQHUPH[P[NRWCCMLSNPOD_ESALHUK@TDFUZHBLJ\XGKL^NXA\EVHSP[D_C^B_^JCX^W]CHBAX]POG@SSAZQ\LE[DCNMUPG_VSC@VJM Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:22:42 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22437 Date: 2002-04-12T17:22:42+00:00 List-Id: I surely don't understand. There's no hashing indicated, and the array+pointer structure, if you make the "pointer" the index of the last full cell, is simply an (array, Last) structure.