From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bill Findlay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anti-Ada FUD (rant) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 08:55:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2f813569-5ff8-4c20-a5ab-8538e6514906@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net BrsHAMyDOY0jWfBS6Ds0MAoksoCu3lgjFidN4dnlXvSB8ugM3S Cancel-Lock: sha1:Fgeday11OdF5nj3SzoLfk9RgI+Y= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: Anti-Ada FUD (rant) Thread-Index: Ac64MkQO1NY7oLCCO066OpZfMrngyQ== Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:17233 Date: 2013-09-23T08:55:27+01:00 List-Id: On 23/09/2013 08:00, in article l1oour$t7r$1@speranza.aioe.org, "Bill Richards" wrote: > ... There will never be > a good desktop experience on UNIX/Linux (not that it bothers me personally) OS X gives me a pretty good desktop experience. > simply because thousands of small programs sloppily thrown together and > relying on thousands of other sloppily written small programs don't scale > and can't be bashed into a coherent whole. How much time must go by until > the motley UNIX crew realize this isn't working? Well it "hasn't" ( really?) been working for 40+ years and I don't see that changimg anytime soon. Strawmen (geddit?) are not a substitute for well founded argument. ... > If they spent as much time polishing their code as they > do their silly communist license boilerplate we'd have quite a different > situation by now "communist"? Your're a teabagger, aren't you? 8-) > ;-) Was that *whole* post tongue-in-cheek? -- Bill Findlay with blueyonder.co.uk; use surname & forename;