From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Accessibility checks
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:03:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CE12B3D6.32F82%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <87mwplvthn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <ks718g$aim$2@dont-email.me>
 <ks7a8v$4nj$1@loke.gir.dk> <CE0CF7DE.329A0%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <9a48d84b-4160-4824-a658-48dfcf12d0d6@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net XaEJSsm6Kl48pH7bcqV1GQkoVVJbxth2U+NBIWQW1j+/OLmsR3
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gMP5bEurSBIqHMMVrpPm8jRTEGw=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206
Thread-Topic: Accessibility checks
Thread-Index: Ac6GukUATQdkLVAWiUie/31BIJQWQQ==
X-Original-Bytes: 2362
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182624
Date: 2013-07-22T10:03:02+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 22/07/2013 07:11, in article
9a48d84b-4160-4824-a658-48dfcf12d0d6@googlegroups.com,
"ake.ragnar.dahlgren@gmail.com" <ake.ragnar.dahlgren@gmail.com> wrote:

> Den torsdagen den 18:e juli 2013 kl. 02:39:42 UTC+2 skrev Bill Findlay:
>> On 18/07/2013 00:44, in article ks7a8v$4nj$1@loke.gir.dk, "Randy Brukardt"
>> <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote: > "Jeffrey Carter"
>> <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> wrote in message >
>> news:ks718g$aim$2@dont-email.me... >> Brukardt, ARG member and editor of the
>> ARM, claims that 'Access never >> works and 'Unchecked_Access is always
>> required, bypassing the >> accessibility checks. While this is not entirely
>> true, it's quite common >> that one must use 'Unchecked_Access, so we could
>> do without these rules >> and checks in the majority of cases. > > That's not
>> entirely true: I did find one (and only one) instance where I was > able to
>> use 'Access in my code (it had to do with a library-level > initialization).
>> Interesting. My projects have 37 occurrences of 'Access and only 2 of
>> 'Unchecked_Access. -- Bill Findlay with blueyonder.co.uk; use surname &
>> forename;
> 
> Perhaps your projects use anonymous access types?

No, I do not use any anonymous access types.

-- 
Bill Findlay
with blueyonder.co.uk;
use  surname & forename;