From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-1?B?s0E=?= Comparison of Four Pseudo Random Number
 Generators Implemented in =?ISO-8859-1?B?QWRhsg==?=
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 23:07:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CE0F7716.32CDD%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <op.w0hhpusdule2fv@cardamome>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net aGWsWHlE9yTDPR7lpo7j4AVHnZ+lQHUeHqLzZn7xRaL818sHTz
Cancel-Lock: sha1:64A/LxeEq6FNvKKMP+2rcaJx2dY=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206
Thread-Topic: =?ISO-8859-1?B?s0E=?= Comparison of Four Pseudo Random Number
 Generators Implemented in =?ISO-8859-1?B?QWRhsg==?=
Thread-Index: Ac6EzEvJaJ2nObKitEGASlTG+cZ7SQ==
X-Original-Bytes: 1615
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182598
Date: 2013-07-19T23:07:02+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 19/07/2013 20:28, in article op.w0hhpusdule2fv@cardamome, "Yannick
Duchêne   (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote:

> I was searching the web for simple pseudo‑random number generator suitable
> for Monte Carlo simulation, when I found a paper comparing some PRNG
> implemented in Ada. Don't know if it well suited for simulation and
> “calculation” based on random input, but probably always worth to be
> mentioned here :-p

Why not use Ada.Numerics.{Discrete,Float}_Random ?

-- 
Bill Findlay
with blueyonder.co.uk;
use  surname & forename;