From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bill Findlay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Accessibility checks Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 01:39:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87mwplvthn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net FiG9ae9gIlrRMzq3tzjxtQmeMbHDdmQXu2pjxqF6MV22NPSZWd Cancel-Lock: sha1:ewTgLVr1x5gz3u60zJDsS/tbx8Q= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206 Thread-Topic: Accessibility checks Thread-Index: Ac6DT0q+IhDJkqreQEu8a2MSlgMeFw== Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16403 Date: 2013-07-18T01:39:42+01:00 List-Id: On 18/07/2013 00:44, in article ks7a8v$4nj$1@loke.gir.dk, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: > "Jeffrey Carter" wrote in message > news:ks718g$aim$2@dont-email.me... >> Brukardt, ARG member and editor of the ARM, claims that 'Access never >> works and 'Unchecked_Access is always required, bypassing the >> accessibility checks. While this is not entirely true, it's quite common >> that one must use 'Unchecked_Access, so we could do without these rules >> and checks in the majority of cases. > > That's not entirely true: I did find one (and only one) instance where I was > able to use 'Access in my code (it had to do with a library-level > initialization). Interesting. My projects have 37 occurrences of 'Access and only 2 of 'Unchecked_Access. -- Bill Findlay with blueyonder.co.uk; use surname & forename;