From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 17 Sep 93 14:37:41 GMT
From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net  (Wes Groleau x1240 C73-8)
Subject: Re: Tasking in Ada
Message-ID: <CDI5yt.Dsu@crdnns.crd.ge.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <rlk.748114486@bonnie> rlk@bonnie.Rational.COM (Robert Kitzberger) w
rites:
>Too bad that tasks can't be generic units -- otherwise you could
>parameterize a task with a unique id (as well as address clauses
>for interrupt entries, etc...)

But a generic package CAN contain a task, which could then know what its 
generic parameters are.  The disadvantage (which would also apply if the
task itself was generic) is that you can't have an array of instantiations;
you'd have to call each by its instantiated name.