From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 Date: 16 Sep 93 13:55:39 GMT From: pacbell.com!att-out!cbnewsl!willett@decwrl.dec.com (david.c.willett) Subject: Re: Ada Pricing & Quality ?? - Vendors Message-ID: List-Id: >>From article , by ryer@dsd.camb.inmet.com (Mi ke Ryer): > Since the base note was fully compliant with my spec, I guess I have > to respond, so here goes: > > 1. Price > > Ada prices are declining across the board. However, you can't compare Unix > workstation prices with PC prices. PC Ada compilers are priced much less > than your $30k, and (I hear) are quite competitively priced to C compilers. > > What do you expect to pay for a non-free C or C++ compiler on a workstation? > I'd really like the input. > > Also, cross-compilers generally cost more than native compilers because the > development cost has to be amortized over a smaller market. > > 2. Useful libraries > > We are planning interfaces to standard support libraries in our next-generati on > products. > > 3. Documentation of limitations; verification of examples > > Yes, quality is important, including document quality. What else can > I say. > > 4. Are we willing to invest to make Ada succeed? > > YES. WATCH THIS SPACE. > > -- Mike Ryer You were doing just fine until #4, Mike. I'm a software developer, not an Ada vendor. That makes me the Ada vendor's customer. Why should I be willing to invest my Company's money to "make Ada succeed"? Making Ada succeed is the vendor's job. My job is to deliver quality software products to meet the needs of *my* customers. As long as vendors have the idea that compiler customers should be "willing to invest" to "make Ada succeed", it won't. Ada will succeed if and only if Ada vendors become convinced that they must offer products which are a clearly superior way for their customers (programmers) to serve their customers (users). Being clearly superior includes being cost effective. <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Willett AT&T Federal Systems Advanced Technologies Remember Dave, you don't pay an anesthesiologist all that money to put you to sleep, you pay him to wake you up afterwards! -- from a discussion on the value of medical specialists