From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_40 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 15 Sep 93 19:59:06 GMT
From: cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!howland.
reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!news.bu.edu!inmet!dsd!ryer@ucbvax.Berkeley.E
DU  (Mike Ryer)
Subject: Re: Ada Pricing & Quality ?? - Vendors
Message-ID: <CDEvIJ.4ML@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Since the base note was fully compliant with my spec, I guess I have
to respond, so here goes:

1. Price

Ada prices are declining across the board.  However, you can't compare Unix
workstation prices with PC prices.  PC Ada compilers are priced much less
than your $30k, and (I hear) are quite competitively priced to C compilers.

What do you expect to pay for a non-free C or C++ compiler on a workstation?
I'd really like the input.

Also, cross-compilers generally cost more than native compilers because the 
development cost has to be amortized over a smaller market.

2. Useful libraries

We are planning interfaces to standard support libraries in our next-generation
products.

3. Documentation of limitations; verification of examples

Yes, quality is important, including document quality.  What else can
I say.

4. Are we willing to invest to make Ada succeed?  

YES.  WATCH THIS SPACE.

-- Mike Ryer