From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada202X: Easy to use "UML private"-like components
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 00:48:50 +0100
Message-ID: <CDED47F2.3133F%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <69246de0-4b33-4d47-b5be-a45e8c911fb0@googlegroups.com>
 <wccwqpnux8n.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <b2m2csFh64iU1@mid.individual.net>
 <9qrbs8l828t3pvgves504a8fm7o1c7tcpj@4ax.com>
 <b2moeeFlshhU1@mid.individual.net>
 <91qcs81k6am9l3u3n19lj0b072lc48td69@4ax.com>
 <b2nmjsFrifnU1@mid.individual.net> <wccmwqhkm22.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <f4d00f07-6220-464b-982e-cd7b67169ad6@googlegroups.com>
 <wccppvc26ef.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <CDECF995.312F1%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <wccmwqgmlzg.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net OcN4a5GarRASoIJKlA8KhgS2Rmnaa3qGIFtp+7jm8V6Yn1gHpS
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EyGv/JF2Kvg7SYQDHuangtCeJBQ=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.33.0.120411
Thread-Topic: Ada202X: Easy to use "UML private"-like components
Thread-Index: Ac5wbDWyTB4Cp1z2IE2dnXQx5GJQkQ==
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182064
Date: 2013-06-24T00:48:50+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 24/06/2013 00:43, in article wccmwqgmlzg.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com,
"Robert A Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:

> Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:
> 
>> That is exactly what Ichbiah's previous language, LIS, had:
>> IIRC interface, representation, and implementation parts as separate
>> compilation units.
> 
> Interesting.  I think maybe I've given my rant before, and maybe you
> have replied with the above information before, but I've forgotten
> it.  I don't know LIS at all, and I'm too lazy to google it right
> now -- maybe one of these days.
> 
> But why, oh why, then, didn't Icbiah include that obvious idea in
> Ada 83?!

50% increase in compilation overheads?

-- 
Bill Findlay
with blueyonder.co.uk;
use  surname & forename;