From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b45e77f55e94488 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.180.8.196 with SMTP id t4mr453240wia.3.1353163010638; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:36:50 -0800 (PST) Path: ha8ni318066wib.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bill Findlay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Question about Rasberry Pi & Kinect [slightly off-topic] Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:36:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <118e0046-2b42-45d9-8dcc-4e84c92fb17c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net zpGLb/R7HSCLi0qUDqnIggcW4ES7h5oVBf8QJq72ez6BYYS0ONimy6w6LdlJSWMy8h Cancel-Lock: sha1:fJ8ccF9/wr1ZrStqQRPpLQuLU9o= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.33.0.120411 Thread-Topic: Question about Rasberry Pi & Kinect [slightly off-topic] Thread-Index: Ac3E0PqWgPQplNTMYEyhh9S0NL7tOA== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-11-17T14:36:50+00:00 List-Id: On 17/11/2012 04:46, in article 118e0046-2b42-45d9-8dcc-4e84c92fb17c@googlegroups.com, "Shark8" wrote: > I'm not really an expert on HW, so I was wondering does it [the Pi] have the > power to process the Kinect depth data? > > This thread seems to indicate that it can run the EE9 emulator: > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/Raspberry > $20Pi/comp.lang.ada/kvbWqRhv96M/lKdIqVsXD6MJ > > Second, I remember there being talk of Ada on/for the Pi, is that project > still active? GNAT is included in the Raspbian OS for the Raspberry Pi. ee9 was compiled on, and runs on, the Raspberry Pi. When running ee9, the 32-bit, 700 MHz Raspberry Pi is 60-70 times slower than my 64-bit, 2.3 GHz Core i7 Macbook Pro. That still makes the emulation 4 to 5 times faster than the historic KDF9 hardware. -- Bill Findlay with blueyonder.co.uk; use surname & forename;