From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6567772e9f3871d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.33.161 with SMTP id s1mr7142853pbi.2.1319031945262;
        Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 d5ni32137pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: organizing deep source trees with child packages
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:45:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAC49317.8737%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: 
 <21c9e6bb-f4f7-4a00-bde7-68f2c1a42d01@q13g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <82ty7d1ewz.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <3486b228-abdd-490f-b4ef-9ee6b19f65fa@gy7g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <7179717a-9837-476c-b564-6599a9c02acd@ff5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <op.v3a9wdv1ule2fv@index.ici> <1qk4l4n9zsdgm$.1bvxdhoq5cpx5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <82hb39umkd.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <qii1up6ovs2p$.1qoobu4chlxcd.dlg@40tude.net>
 <82botev9j0.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <wrrzl08ki6he.1dmd6vvvbuk6d$.dlg@40tude.net> <m262jms0hv.fsf@pushface.org>
 <87mxcykvhb.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <m21uuaruu7.fsf@pushface.org>
 <CAC3B57D.8695%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> <m2wrc1qyuu.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net bBpTuyXiHMXRAArABC0vJA0gMsh9MqlgaNg5jX1CKJdiNbfFgE
Cancel-Lock: sha1:M6AaC2AOY1/ME4C+FKGSPvk3Cd0=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117
Thread-Topic: organizing deep source trees with child packages
Thread-Index: AcyOZWVXffzFNmONFkC/S9hf6rTI5w==
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18602
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2011-10-19T14:45:43+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 19/10/2011 07:28, in article m2wrc1qyuu.fsf@pushface.org, "Simon Wright"
<simon@pushface.org> wrote:

> Bill Findlay <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:
>  
>> I first encountered emacs in the late 1970s, on our Unix V7 PDP-11/45.
>> That machine had 248K of RAM.  Emacs was several times bigger than the
>> entire store, which supported 16 users well (if emacs was not running)
>> or one user badly (when emacs was running).  I saw no good reason for
>> that extravagance and have not changed my mind since.
> 
> I've just opened GPS, and it's running at 117 Mb (the X11 server I
> wouldn't be running otherwise is at 27 Mb).
> 
> Emacs (open for days, including this newsreader) is at 104 Mb.
> 
> Safari is top at >600 Mb! (Safari + Safari Web Content).

Don't confuse me with facts! 8-)

-- 
Bill Findlay
with blueyonder.co.uk;
use  surname & forename;