From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3c954699331ed525,start X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Bill Findlay Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: pragma Interrupt_State Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:25:00 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net Q3AuiaiD3XzvTZsHEVveBguYiviaxfLZEyaxhdIIy++cGGa73e Cancel-Lock: sha1:rWZBqZg99w0hs+cj9fUY0UWkga8= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117 Thread-Topic: pragma Interrupt_State Thread-Index: AcwxXYPO5fmMjvYgiUiaMnJH3VTafw== Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20009 Date: 2011-06-23T05:25:00+01:00 List-Id: Using GNAT GPL 2011 on Snow Leopard, I find that that including the configuration pragma: pragma Interrupt_State(Name => SIGINT, State => USER); in a build slows down a program of mine by about 50% (it's an assembler and the pragma reduces its performance from 1.25M SLOC/sec to 0.85M SLOC/sec). Can anyone suggest why it might have that remarkable effect? -- Bill Findlay with blueyonder.co.uk; use surname & forename;