From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 8 Jul 93 16:58:22 GMT
From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net  (Wes Groleau X7574)
Subject: Re: Admiral Tuttle
Message-ID: <C9uv5A.I60@crdnns.crd.ge.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Jul7.170414.21988@sei.cmu.edu> progers@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Pat Ro
gers) writes:
>It would appear that Adm. Tuttle's speech writer is less than well informed.

That's an understatement!

>No, Ada 83/9X is'nt/won't be pefect. I just wish those who address
>technical topics would do their homework.

Yes, Admiral Tuttle obviously needs a little education. Preceding sentence has
been edited to remove flames :-)

However, as a former sailor (13 years) and Navy contractor (8 years), I
must regrettably remind you that Admirals tend to get their way.