From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 8 Jul 93 12:17:45 GMT
From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net  (Wes Groleau X7574)
Subject: Re: Question of Visibility
Message-ID: <C9uI5L.4oJ@crdnns.crd.ge.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In all the discussion on "hiding" STANDARD.BOOLEAN with a different bit
pattern, I have yet to see two issues addressed:

1. I would expect STANDARD.BOOLEAN in any implementation to match the internal
hardware's conditional instructions.

2. IF one somehow succeeded in hiding STANDARD.BOOLEAN, wouldn't the compiler
generate the same code as before for  if  statements?

Wes Groleau