From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6bf1c4b845bd2160
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!194.25.134.126.MISMATCH!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What about a glob standard method in Ada.Command_Line ?
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:05:43 +0100
Message-ID: <C89B4437.14E179%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <op.vhrt97eexmjfy8@garhos>
 <i4nsfv$jpe$1@news.eternal-september.org>
 <4c6f9837$0$5420$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
 <i4rs3k$t6v$1@news.eternal-september.org> <i4uutv$ivu$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <op.vhw01ogsule2fv@garhos>
 <eb3ef42d-5631-4434-b43c-f50e9813291b@f6g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
 <4c739e76$0$6992$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <152a2z5en4z2o$.xjsuqr7s8yak$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c73e859$0$6991$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <cgcipmczsqwm.ppd1a9aky2z5.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c73fcf6$0$6992$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <1jxm50y65grlo.sjyb9hm4y1xp$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4c743a59$0$6893$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <bxz3ymdyul62$.16pl56dd68msl.dlg@40tude.net> <op.vhziy8yyxmjfy8@garhos>
 <C89B388C.14E16E%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk> <op.vh0gzhj0xmjfy8@garhos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Sloh2XUpAlgAl9kEEvri4wSUVxyAwzvS+bKKxbYEm/DB6iE8sY
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zoyhEFPbG/MAi+IMmyS4B4x5/b4=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Thread-Topic: What about a glob standard method in Ada.Command_Line ?
Thread-Index: ActEmUd5xsmY6th7gECkYmcKViH6tw==
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13742
Date: 2010-08-25T22:05:43+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 25/08/2010 21:39, in article op.vh0gzhj0xmjfy8@garhos, "Yannick Duch�ne
(Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote:

> I do not own a Mac, so may be indeed I was wrong somewhere. But I use to
> read about the Mac system and philosophy to try to figure if there is or
> not a technical solution to compile Mac applications from Windows. So I
> came to this topic, and really I read something about it, stating
> something changed there when switching from the ancient Mac 0S up to 9, to
> the new Mac OS X (completely different system in the core, while mostly
> compatible in many topics). And I am sure I have read complaints about the
> file extension � la Windows vs  the file type tag. May be both are still
> coexisting and there is just less focus on the type tag so fans of the
> original Mac way was disappointed ? (as I said, I do not own a Mac, so
> cannot figure this my self)
> 
> Any way, thanks for the possible error you noticed.
> 
>> See <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Type_Identifier>.
> Oh s**t, wikipedia again. Fed-up, sorry, will try to peak another source,
> sure there must be another one.

 <http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/FileManagement/Concep
tual/understanding_utis/understand_utis_conc/understand_utis_conc.html#//app
le_ref/doc/uid/TP40001319-CH202-CHDHIJDE>

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk