From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b6d862eabdeb1fc4
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used?
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 19:32:46 +0100
Message-ID: <C81F335E.14438C%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <jhaJn.4661$z%6.1650@edtnps83>
 <0e88de66-128c-48fd-9b9f-fdb4357f318a@z17g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>
 <XogJn.4313$Z6.4310@edtnps82> <tarujgrysngw.1ln7awtgq3otu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <m8jJn.4317$Z6.1405@edtnps82> <op.vc40fcksule2fv@garhos>
 <22aKn.4575$Z6.3399@edtnps82>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net sicbRjAOf8gswYIZnYR9kgUWR/M6vBjfnaZqgV7a0oMy9EnKFk
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8cp2zHXjthmqeQhXxYV7a0/IV14=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
Thread-Topic: Ada noob here! Is Ada widely used?
Thread-Index: Acr6pla5NYNP5n0B30el862ETGIfqQ==
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11902
Date: 2010-05-23T19:32:46+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 23/05/2010 14:26, in article 22aKn.4575$Z6.3399@edtnps82, "Duke
Normandin" <dukeofperl@ml1.net> wrote:

> On 2010-05-23, Yannick Duch�ne <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>> Le Fri, 21 May 2010 00:58:26 +0200, Duke Normandin <dukeofperl@ml1.net> a
>> �crit:
>>> Ada continues to attract me; but so does Miranda ( and Giselle and Sophie
>>> ...)  ;)
>> These are two very different paths. Miranda would be more close to what
>> are ?domain specific languages?... well, not exactly, but close.
>> 
> 
> Domain-specific? How so? Because it's a functional language, and therefore
> only good for .....

Not much at all.

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk