From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b8a1363302988cfe
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard)
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:01:51 +0000
Message-ID: <C7585FEF.12F99E%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: 
 <af608388-8088-4779-a3ca-39275fd2c6cc@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
  <C75686D3.12F4F0%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <5b0bf629-0935-414d-9a57-1757632840b8@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
  <C756B67A.12F52F%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <a7b97585-f616-43e9-ac61-c468c88362fa@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
  <96854a61-2032-49b1-a8b2-8a5aee181701@22g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>
  <C7573F0A.12F81C%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <68e6e09a-9f02-4fd4-a87c-d1c43dd104e1@27g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>
  <C7580162.12F90C%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <eeaf5cb6-a582-4c90-a494-bd17142600a8@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net q0RT7bO1hnLvs3iLMxM0cQACp4B/Fym6C4lTcXoaxmhLKMtC7c
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pn4L2gBejhOkCIJANSwKfBUDpbY=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Thread-Topic: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard)
Thread-Index: AcqELEtJppoQZxp7X0uC0hOyoySWfQ==
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8507
Date: 2009-12-24T00:01:51+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 23/12/2009 23:44, in article
eeaf5cb6-a582-4c90-a494-bd17142600a8@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com, "sjw"
<simon.j.wright@mac.com> wrote:

> On Dec 23, 5:18�pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 23/12/2009 14:26, in article
>> 68e6e09a-9f02-4fd4-a87c-d1c43dd10...@27g2000yqr.googlegroups.com, "sjw"
>> <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
>>> On Dec 23, 3:29�am, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> [...]
>>>> What on earth has happened for GNAT to regress so badly in the face of what
>>>> is often described as a tidying-up and performance release of OS X?
>> 
>>> I don't know either, because here it compiles without complaint at -O
>>> {0,1,2,3}!
>> 
>> Hmm. Interesting ...
>> What could account for the difference?
>> Do you have any other versions of GNAT installed in that testing
>> environment?
> 
> Several! though I'd be surprised if any of them got invoked. Will
> check further.

What I had in mind was interference between libraries, etc.

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk