From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b8a1363302988cfe
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard)
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:21:59 +0000
Message-ID: <C7580237.12F90E%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: 
 <af608388-8088-4779-a3ca-39275fd2c6cc@r24g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
  <C75686D3.12F4F0%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <5b0bf629-0935-414d-9a57-1757632840b8@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
  <C756B67A.12F52F%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <a7b97585-f616-43e9-ac61-c468c88362fa@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
 <C7571011.12F7F1%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <4b321fb4$0$7621$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net JD5CtrIy/Cu/NP/79bg/dgih8HOvtoXDzciwSmVgULJxT8LJvo
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zFPV3qfzomp137uxSMWnpkFGdss=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605
Thread-Topic: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard)
Thread-Index: AcqD9G7wTO3IFE5XVUuQ+ThyNypekw==
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8501
Date: 2009-12-23T17:21:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 23/12/2009 13:48, in article
4b321fb4$0$7621$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net, "Georg Bauhaus"
<rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote:

> (see below) schrieb:
> 
>> That works very nicely, and, unlike the other SL compilers I've tried
>> previously, code compiled with inlining at -O3 does not malfunction
>> (on the two major test cases I've tried so far, anyway).
> 
> FWIW, when we tried to find the best options for the Shootout
> programs, it turned out that -gnatn -O2 -funroll-loops was
> about as good as -O3. Sometimes the results were even faster.

I dare say.
I have made similar trials for my own code, and the optimization
flags I use are empirically the best for its object code speed.

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk