From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b8a1363302988cfe X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "(see below)" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 00:08:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5b0bf629-0935-414d-9a57-1757632840b8@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net ovJoJTnGrxwt99mC1pGtSQuHaxwEAjurdjx7XvW5+kJ6EECDy9 Cancel-Lock: sha1:dHIVq1hHxGeCZ75G14P4VSrj5Es= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Thread-Topic: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard) Thread-Index: AcqDZBoFU4lYAkVsFUyQo4traUi5uA== Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8490 Date: 2009-12-23T00:08:49+00:00 List-Id: On 22/12/2009 21:52, in article a7b97585-f616-43e9-ac61-c468c88362fa@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com, "sjw" wrote: > On Dec 22, 5:46�pm, "(see below)" wrote: > >> This is what happened when I tried out the 32-bit version: > [...] >> dyld: Symbol not found: ___gmpn_bases >> � Referenced from: >> /opt/gnat-gpl-2009/libexec/gcc/i386-apple-darwin10.2.0/4.3.4/gnat1 >> � Expected in: /usr/local/lib/libmpfr.1.dylib >> �in /opt/gnat-gpl-2009/libexec/gcc/i386-apple-darwin10.2.0/4.3.4/gnat1 > > Very sorry about that. Have uploaded a more appropriate libmpfr at the > same place as the compiler (seems to be taking its time to appear ...) > unpack /some/where and > > $ export DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=/some/where That works very nicely, and, unlike the other SL compilers I've tried previously, code compiled with inlining at -O3 does not malfunction (on the two major test cases I've tried so far, anyway). You might be interested to see what I'm doing with it: . (The KDF9 had a 48-bit word, and M is a 64-bit machine, so their emulators run in 64-bit mode at more than twice the speed of 32-bit mode.) Thanks for these great efforts. -- Bill Findlay chez blueyonder.co.uk