From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 15 Apr 93 13:14:03 GMT
From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net  (Wes Groleau X7574)
Subject: Re: Classes vs types; what's the difference?
Message-ID: <C5J0rG.DuF@crdnns.crd.ge.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Apr15.093550@lglsun.epfl.ch> magnus@lglsun.epfl.ch (Magnus Kemp
e) writes:
>So, there are good reasons not to go the "class type" way.
>Finding other reasons is left as an exercise for the readers...

Like readability, as in making it similar to a human language, and making it
somewhat descriptive of what's happening.

   type roster is class record .....  :-)