From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55ae3803eb91d6ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada UK conference: SPARK safety: is no delivery better than 1
 defect?
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:39:18 +0000
Message-ID: <C5DEB2F6.10EDBF%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <q9ntl.33022$l71.13235@newsfe23.iad>
 <C5DC2FAE.10E8E6%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <zsMtl.48994$Tp5.224@newsfe13.iad>
 <C5DD7F3A.10EC04%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <lB5ul.64542$Rg3.54974@newsfe17.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net 5VHTpLTfbMjmaTOvGF5GHQoIJOA5zipLsoscRrPFFOkJHsJlnT
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PFWO3XIRxkQnXsK9pu8uTrWkTLo=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
Thread-Topic: Ada UK conference: SPARK safety: is no delivery better than 1
 defect?
Thread-Index: AcmjD49AFwPqd9Fr9UGLX7LjTlfH9A==
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5036
Date: 2009-03-12T12:39:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12/03/2009 10:36, in article lB5ul.64542$Rg3.54974@newsfe17.iad,
"Michael" <fvit@shaw.ca> wrote:

> Hi Bill and all,
> 
[verbiage snipped] 
> 

You did not answer my question.

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk