From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,55ae3803eb91d6ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada UK conference: SPARK safety: is no delivery better than 1
 defect?
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:54:38 +0000
Message-ID: <C5DC2FAE.10E8E6%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <q9ntl.33022$l71.13235@newsfe23.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net uDgjOAW987UOB53aSZrXgQpTeSiIZE9rfYGkksggUsynXGRoNh
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/7vHWCUfcgDt0LW8adYhD766Vp4=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
Thread-Topic: Ada UK conference: SPARK safety: is no delivery better than 1
 defect?
Thread-Index: AcmhkCJTn98CpPxBIkCiPFlmZKPU9A==
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4016
Date: 2009-03-10T14:54:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 10/03/2009 05:47, in article q9ntl.33022$l71.13235@newsfe23.iad,
"Michael" <fvit@shaw.ca> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The next Ada Conference UK 2009 (March 24, in London), is to highlight the
> increased relevance of Ada in safety-and security-critical programming.
> 
...
> 
> In regards to the Tokeneer mini-project findings, were the safety critical
> iFACTS project's delays and deficiencies predictable?
> 
> That should be one of the main Ada Conference safety concerns. (Tookeneer
> and SPARK are both in the Ada conference program, but not iFACTS yet!).

Do you have any evidence that iFACTS problems are due to the Ada language?

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk