From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 7 Apr 93 20:33:48 GMT
From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net  (Wes Groleau X7574)
Subject: Re: C to ADA translators.
Message-ID: <C54rsC.1us@crdnns.crd.ge.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Apr7.182705.1887@mksol.dseg.ti.com> mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (f
red j mccall 575-3539) writes:
>As far as I'm concerned, the solution in the specific case mentioned
>would seem to be to get a waiver and do the remaining 5% in C.  How is
>Wes going to do code walkthroughs on the (translated) Ada, which is
>going to be virtually unreadable?

If it's unreadable, then the C couldn't have been much better.  If it was that
bad, I would have chosen to re-code in Ada rather than translate.