From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
Date: 6 Apr 93 18:31:08 GMT
From: news.crd.ge.com!e7sa!groleau@uunet.uu.net  (Wes Groleau X7574)
Subject: Re: Hackers (was Is General Kind)
Message-ID: <C52rFw.Aox@crdnns.crd.ge.com>
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <1993Apr5.131014.7376@mcc.com> breland@mcc.com writes:
>   "Put an exception handler in every routine so it won't crash...but the
>   performance may require more cycles and I/O channels.  Oh, there are
>   no more available resources?  Hmmmm.  What?...a design document?...
>   traceability?...capacity and throughput analysis?...what are those?
>   Aren't ya supposed to just code to fit the spec?...oh, by the way,
>   I'll get to those inline comments after I finish this next project..."
>

You have short-changed another "class" of "hacker" who says:

   "you guys start coding.  I'll go find out what they want"