From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,640b65cbfbab7216 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "(see below)" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada.Strings.Bounded Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:36:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <144w648u50r6q.1erjxxu0cplbw.dlg@40tude.net> <611360e0-595c-43a7-b5cb-137a278ec0c1@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <15389tuelo6x6$.1c1a6yixordts$.dlg@40tude.net> <4c1be2a2-0178-4c1f-8c96-526020550f42@w4g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <15514187-d7d0-4650-a058-13ec5684be2c@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <07e98c4f-9b79-412f-9e95-94dd04082355@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <3eb5775f-c7f7-4f92-9154-8f25246b8592@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <480f1298$0$6782$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> <62dde2ab-d6ad-454b-aa87-8dbc23855903@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net zUDvC+gg9nN22QB4E4fBwwR9pcbg8YSlMcdBTPgS0EuUPzSvlj Cancel-Lock: sha1:BVG1bts5ctkmO5hPvykr7Ue4+ec= User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.1.0.080305 Thread-Topic: Ada.Strings.Bounded Thread-Index: AcilV9obbmtkbOoo30qOZugDoDqGtQ== Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21063 Date: 2008-04-23T16:36:52+01:00 List-Id: On 23/04/2008 16:12, in article 62dde2ab-d6ad-454b-aa87-8dbc23855903@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com, "Adam Beneschan" wrote: > On Apr 23, 3:42 am, Georg Bauhaus > wrote: > >> Without of course knowing why the choices were made the >> way they were made for the LRM, my conclusion is that >> many programmers still prefer high school ideas about >> numbers over the theory of computer numbers. > > Nahhh, we just want to write programs that work, and have a language > that helps prevent us from making stupid errors, but without forcing > us to waste time writing needless junk in order to have things fit > more consistently into some "theory". Remember, "theory" is our > servant, not our master. Bravo! -- Bill Findlay chez blueyonder.co.uk