From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,11c630572e59f461 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "(see below)" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bug in GNAT GPL 2006? Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 03:51:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <545av3F1ukgfpU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net gonLTXJjk7i3tPGvI946gw3i+xjpXBtwUhmanhv+fByjKcUrnX User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 Thread-Topic: Bug in GNAT GPL 2006? Thread-Index: AcdW/dfDFowkK8LxEduenwARJIjQTg== Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9436 Date: 2007-02-23T03:51:05+00:00 List-Id: On 23/2/07 01:37, in article wccwt29k61q.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com, "Robert A Duff" wrote: > If you report this inlining bug to AdaCore, it will eventually get > fixed. In fact, I've been working on this extended-return stuff lately, > so I am indeed interested in seeing bug reports related to that. > > By the way, I think the bogus warning mentioned above is fixed in the > latest GNAT sources. And as far as I know, the generated code is > correct even in the presence of that warning. Bob, can you say what is the correct mechanism for reporting bugs in GNAT GPL? -- Bill Findlay chez blueyonder.co.uk