From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,11c630572e59f461 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "(see below)" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Bug in GNAT GPL 2006? Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:57:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net L9jsa067VvW3FuLyXMa+mQoV5QEafMvwhiBtiluIFBlUZYH6cQ User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 Thread-Topic: Bug in GNAT GPL 2006? Thread-Index: AcdV+uEYH+wzgMHuEduXeQARJIjQTg== Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:9384 Date: 2007-02-21T20:57:21+00:00 List-Id: On 21/2/07 20:19, in article mailman.102.1172089201.18371.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org, "Randy Brukardt" wrote: >> return result : Boolean do >> | >>>>> warning: variable "result" is assigned but never read >> I'm inclined to assume that this is a compiler bug, but can >> anyone more knowledgeable about Ada 200[57] confirm this? > > Sure looks like a (harmless) compiler bug to me. It's hard to imagine why > you would be required to read the result of a function before returning it. Thanks, Randy. -- Bill Findlay chez blueyonder.co.uk