From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21960280f1d61e84
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: "(see below)" <yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How come Ada isn't more popular?
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:36:29 +0000
Message-ID: <C1E6D87D.92583%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
References: <1169531612.200010.153120@38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <L2ith.12633$ji1.1337@newssvr12.news.prodigy.net>
 <mailman.44.1169724732.18371.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <WaBuh.15096$pQ3.10501@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <xwsldwre3j.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <HYPuh.15976$yx6.6882@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <md64ashx3o.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <1mahvxskejxe1$.tx7bjdqyo2oj$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <2tfy9vgph3.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <1g7m33bys8v4p.6p9cpsh3k031$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <s1mz41g7d3.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <wccps8w8eyc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <i84pq8mbbi.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <wcchcu6zu9d.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <C1E6D1AD.9256E%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <wcc1wlazsy6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net k515t6jc4Buciajltbloyghe1/74+Koq+lcBxUWMZlSuR4McBs
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Thread-Topic: How come Ada isn't more popular?
Thread-Index: AcdFkKF44En3drGDEduzcQARJIjQTg==
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8797
Date: 2007-01-31T23:36:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 31/1/07 23:18, in article wcc1wlazsy6.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com, "Robert A
Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:

> Now tell me which of the following things called X is a "component of
> type T"?
> 
>     type T is
>         record
>             X : Integer;
>         end record;
> 
>     type Something is
>         record
>             X : T;
>         end record;
> 
> ;-)

The RM seems to talk about components of objects rather than
components of types, so I'm *guessing* the second. 8-)

-- 
Bill Findlay
<surname><forename> chez blueyonder.co.uk