From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c31acc89d296bc62 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.201.147.78.MISMATCH!feeder.news-service.com!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!npeersf01.ams.highwinds-media.com!newsfe17.ams2.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail From: Per Sandberg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100621 Fedora/3.0.5-1.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Design problem: generic package vs tagged subtype References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:14:09 UTC Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 23:14:07 +0200 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:13081 Date: 2010-07-01T23:14:07+02:00 List-Id: Maybe, But the sentence is readable for two legged carbon-based beings. /P On 07/01/2010 09:59 PM, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > On 07/01/2010 12:28 PM, Simon Wright wrote: >> >> Quite often (IMO) there's no need to use named association *for the >> first parameter* in a case like this. >> >> Send ("hello world", To => Server); >> >> for example. > > This violates my coding standard. >