From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d82559111ee5ba X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Benjamin Shade Subject: Re: ObjectAda Professional GUI Builder Date: 1996/10/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 191214678 distribution: world x-nntp-posting-host: shadebs.demon.co.uk references: <01bbbc5d$ac75c3c0$629148a6@cornerstone.kee.aetc.af.mil> organization: Ben and Sue Shade mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: Benjamin Shade newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I have used the previous version of ObjectAda (ActiveAda 5.2.2 - Ada '83 for Windows NT) and the GUI builder that comes with that sounds similar to the one your are all talking about (although I have not as yet installed or seen the new ObjectAda). The best way of using the old version is to just use it for basic window layout and no more. After that it is best to write the windows program using 'code' and not go back to the GUI editor. If your are can write windows programs using 'C' or 'C++' then it is often not worth using it at all and just write vanilla Ada with the Win32 and use a Resource Editor for producing those pretty windows! Has anybody used both the old ActiveAda and the new ObjectAda? Is its GUI builder any better? ---------------------<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>-------------------- Ben Shade -> Home: Ben@shadebs.demon.co.uk Portsmouth|> Work: ???????@gecm.com England,UK|> Web : http://www.shadebs.demon.co.uk