From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8fbb80525a3ce8ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-20 12:56:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9tc0qk$cee$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Subject: Re: UML & Ada Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 15:56:01 EST Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:56:01 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16754 Date: 2001-11-20T20:56:01+00:00 List-Id: In article <9tc0qk$cee$1@nh.pace.co.uk>, Marin David Condic says... > >The last time I went informally cruising through anything to do with the >UML, I seem to recall that it lacked any means of representing Ada tasks. >Through interaction diagrams, you kind of had a way of saying how one thread >of control would interact with another, but when it came to representing >something that should be translated to a task, complete with rendesvous, >etc, there didn't seem to be any way of expressing this. Not directly, but there are ways. Before you give up on UML, check out "Designing Concurrent, Distributed, and Real-Time Applications with UML" ( http://www.aw.com/product/0,2627,0201657937,00.html ). That helped us a bit. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.