From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,77e27ce5376e1d4,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-29 11:58:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsrout1.ntli.net!news.ntli.net!newspeer1-win.server.ntli.net!newsfe3-win.server.ntli.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: KDE Anyone? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 21:00:31 +0100 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.107.63.68 X-Trace: newsfe3-win.server.ntli.net 1080590305 81.107.63.68 (Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:58:25 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:58:25 GMT Organization: NTL Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6658 Date: 2004-03-29T21:00:31+01:00 List-Id: Hi, Anyone know of a KDE binding for Ada. I looked on the net and found someone had started one. Where's it at? Is it active? The post talked about having a fairly substantial binding to QT, but it was July 2003. What's happened since then? How hard is it to bind to C++? I gather objects complicate things a lot. Would using a C++ based binding on Linux force me to move to something like Gcc 3.xx based compilers. This is not really a problem (I like playing with experimental sw!), it's simply that AFAIK there's no firm schedule on when the Ada compiler in Gcc 3.xx will be stable. Like I say not a problem, just something I need to account for. Cheers, Chris p.s. before anyone states the obvious... of course I know about GtkAda, I'm evaluating other options.