From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,124189fcae964f11 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s04.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Jeff C," Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: Command Line Argument Package X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s04 1090972257 24.147.74.171 (Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:57 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:57 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 23:50:57 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2428 Date: 2004-07-27T23:50:57+00:00 List-Id: "Larry Kilgallen" wrote in message news:Dva2i$xEkliG@eisner.encompasserve.org... > In article , "Jeff C," writes: > > I've posted a command line argument helper/utility package that I've had > > around for a while. I've used it on a few small things and had intended to > > clean it up some more and post it someday but it is already pretty useful. > > It would be better for your announcement of such to indicate what you > mean by "command line argument" processing. > > Is this restricted to the "-this -THAT" Unix-style command lines ? It is "designed" around the Unix/GNU approach (-f hello.txt or --file hello.txt) but it really does not make the -this assumption. Will work just file with /X /A /C style "Win32" arguments but it will then not accept win32 style subarguments (since they are often concatentated onto the argument in question (e.g. format /T:80) Nothing stops you from using Unix like options on win32 platforms. Plenty of programs do. Granted on vxWorks it probably won't work for calling arbitrary routines from the target shell. On an osless non-command-line OS it might not work at all.